our ethical relationship to the natural world

Starting decades ago, I developed what became a growing interest in environmental ethics. During the past two years, I've spent a considerable amount time reading even more recent literature in this discipline. By far the clearest exposition of these ideas - for me - comes from the 2012 book from one of the "grandfathers" in this field: Professor Holmes Rolston III, who taught at Colorado State University for many years. "A New Environmental Ethics: The Next Millennium for Life on Earth" is both a foundational background in understanding the issues, and a guide to looking toward the future. I really can't recommend any book more enthusiastically. It has informed and changed my understanding of the issues in many ways. 

birds & climate change - some readings

If you'd like to learn more about the effect of climate change on birds, here are some good readings:

Amrosini et al (2011) on ecological mismatch at arrival, here

Sekercioglu et al. (2012) The effect of climate change on tropical birds, here

learning about biodiversity - taking it to the next level

Much work has been done at the international level on biodiversity  conservation. Go the website of the Convention on Biological Diversity and read about the Aichi Targets. This can take your learning about these critical conservation issues to the next level.

more on disturbance-induced stress and birds and ethical birding

A considerable amount of research has been devoted in recent years to the harmful effect of stress to some bird species and other wildlife, caused by a heavy human presence, repeated flushing or other types of disturbance - especially in the context  of cold weather, in locations where roost sites are at a premium, and especially for some forest grouse, some species of geese, some owl species, and others. There is on the other hand some research that argues that  we may sometimes oversimplify our understanding of this issue. Is there then a "final answer"? Will there ever be?

My emphasis continues to be on the protection and conservation of birds. Some comments on the Wisconsin   Birding Facebook page and Wisbirdnet question the need for restraint in regard to posting locations of roosting owls, or other "sensitive species". Some apparently feel there is no need for "ethics and birding" to be a consideration. But many sources recommend this; and while it is obvious that not everyone agrees, the evidence of potential harmful effects to wildlife gleaned from the literature does even more to convince me that restraint should take precedence in many instances.

It is not my intention to attempt to limit people's field activities, spoil their birding experience, or create bad feelings between myself and  birders who disagree. I share this information in the hope that we may all learn more about the behavior of the birds we treasure. Learning more can indeed improve our experiences, and can help us to do a more effective job of conserving birds for our future - and theirs.

One of the most valuable papers I've found in recent days (Beale, C. M. 2007. The behavioral ecology of disturbance responses. International Journal of Comparative Psychology. 20: 111-120. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/43m7b2d5 ) includes this abstract:

"Measuring the impacts of anthropogenic activities on wildlife is crucial for ensuring effective management. Animal behavior is often considered a sensitive index of impact, but its use requires detailed understanding of the context dependent decisions animals make. In this manuscript I identify a number of areas where insights from the field of animal behavior are relevant to studies of human disturbance and activity. In particular, I differentiate between disturbance effects and disturbance impacts and show how context-dependent decision-making often makes animal behavior an unreliable index of impact. I show the areas where animal behavior can be useful in quantifying minimum disturbance impact when additional information is available, and identify a number of areas where further research may help improve the management of anthropogenic activities within wildlife areas."

Ethics and Birding - Sources

http://www.aba.org/about/ethics.html
http://eastsideaudubon.org/birding/birding-ethics
http://www.wisconsinbirds.org/ethicalstandards.htm
http://www.naturephotographers.net/ethics.html

Literature on Stress and Disturbance to Wildlife, and Links to More on the Long-eared Owl

Beale, C. M. 2007. The behavioral ecology of disturbance responses. International Journal of Comparative Psychology. 20: 111-120. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/43m7b2d5

Smith, D. G. and A. Devine. 1993. Winter ecology of the Long-eared Owl in Connecticut. Conn. Warbler 13:44-53.

THIEL, D., S. JENNI-EIERMANN, R. RUPERT PALME, L. JENNI. 2011. Winter tourism increases stress hormone levels in the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus. Ibis: Volume 153, Issue 1, pages 122–133, January 2011

Ulmschneider, H. 1990. Post-nesting ecology of the Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) in southwestern Idaho. Master's Thesis. Boise State Univ. Boise, ID.

Ulmschneider, H. 1993. Wintering and nesting site use by Long-eared Owls in the Snake River Birds of Prey Area. Pages 318-323 in Snake River Birds of Prey Area 1993 annual report. (Steenhof, K., Ed.) Bur. Land Manage., Boise Dist. Boise, ID.

Wijnandts, H. 1984. Ecological energetics of the Long-eared Owl (Asio otus). Ardea 72:1-92.

OTHER LINKS:

Winter sports threaten indigenous mountain birds:

http://www.wildlifeextra.com/go/news/ski-bird-threat.html#cr

Wildlife Viewing Ethics: Alaska Department of Fish and Game: http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=viewing.ethics